...and when prominent Leftist academics like [Brian] Leiter are so thought-disordered, I supppose we have to expect almost brain-dead Leftists like Treacher.
Yeah, that Treacher is a real treat. I'm laughing all the way to the high density explosives dump.
Etc.
That Treach! Such a kidder. At least I think he's kidding...
10. You.Posted by Jim Treacher at October 25, 2004 03:50 PM
9. Are.
8. A.
7. Stupid.
6. Lefty.
5. Chode.
4. Stroker.
3. Go.
2. Eat.
1. Schitt.
Mary Cheney comes to mind: if she's an out lesbian, why all the fuss about mentioning it?
In this case, we've got stupid people getting outed (or pretending to be stupid people and pretending to be offended at being outed as stupid). But I'm sure they'll all sleep easier knowing that Dick and Lynn have got their backs.
Posted by: jon at October 25, 2004 06:49 PMDhinger. Your a total right wing Dhinger. I read that thread I'm not stupid, I can understand what your trying to get at. I'm not stupid. Irawqar wrong blog showed class on that other thread and didn't let you have it like you deserved dhinger. Is what you are. Might of known by your post's all making fun of not voting for Bush and his wrong war's. That one guy is right that your brain dead at least you have the fair and balanced aspect to report it. Dhinger. EVer read anything good like atrios or Irawwaqwar wrong blog or Yglesias? Dint think so dhinger.
I ought to like totally troll on this blog for good, but I have more class (almost as much as Iraqwarwaswrong blog) but you wouldnt' know anything what that means like a reputzi dhinger that you are.
Out.
Jim (ever sarry I have your same name dhinger
Posted by: notadhinger at October 25, 2004 07:05 PMMaybe Brad'll send you a loving, caring e-mail full of loving care like he did to me. If I remember correctly, the title was "Fuck You." And he called me a "brownshirt." Godwined himself in his second letter.
Oh, and if you want a REAL reason not to vote for Bush, I heard he said your momma was fat and promiscuous.
Posted by: Big Brother at October 25, 2004 07:43 PM"I'm laughing all the way to the high density explosives dump."
D'oh!
Posted by: Angus Jung at October 25, 2004 08:24 PMhttp://www.nationalreview.com/kerry/kerry200410252109.asp
Posted by: Angus "No hyperlinks?" Jung at October 25, 2004 08:24 PMYou know, something is really bothering me.
No, not the apparent inability of people with drivers' licenses to recognize satire when it practically jumps in their lap and gives them the tongue -- I'm _used_ to that massive life-disappointment. No, what I really want to know is--
WHAT THE FUCKING FUCK IS A "DHINGER"???
Posted by: Andrea Harris at October 25, 2004 09:05 PMJeez, dhinger (you probly are too, hanging around here in this reputzi site). Go over to iraqwarwrong blog and look at how Iraqwarwrong WHOSE BLOG IS TOTALLY BETTER THAN THIS BLOG OR INSTAHACK OR ANY OF thoseother blog's explains these words in the vocablary list you can click on. Hello? Jeez, it's should be pretty much one of the main blogs but you dhinger nazi's squish all dissent to where only Instahack and noone else.
Jim
Posted by: notadhinger at October 25, 2004 09:44 PMCan I invent new words and use them to promote my website? No, I haven't a website to promote. But I can invent new words to insult people, like Jim Notadhinger.
But I'd rather stick to well-known commodities and call him a dork.
Posted by: jon at October 25, 2004 09:55 PMThat's not my website dhinger. Duh. It's like did you even read my post's. I said it was of somebody ELSE'S website dhinger (duh). Iraqwarwrong would probly go in circles around you. you'd be like what. Most of his (her?) post's are even over my head.
Whatever
Jim
Posted by: notadhinger at October 25, 2004 10:06 PM"notadhinger" is totally biting Jim's style - how gauche.
Unless it is Treacher.
I'm probably the first person to float that theory.
Posted by: Dylan at October 25, 2004 10:13 PMI'm not Jim Treacher. My name is Jim that's all. EVer heard of Jims? And if I was him would I say I was Jim? I heard of htis site over at Iraqwarwas wrongblog and came over and then I saw that 10 things post and lost my cool (look I'm rely not about trolling sarry, relly). All's I'm saying is go check out that blog and like THINK for once about not being dhingers.
Jim
Posted by: notadhinger at October 25, 2004 10:18 PMThe Dissecting Leftism site removed the link to you, apparently without explanation. You dhinger.
Posted by: Matt Moore at October 25, 2004 10:28 PMFafblog!!! And bunnies!!!
Oh, wait...this isn't protein wisdom! Where am I?
Posted by: Sean M. at October 25, 2004 11:11 PM""notadhinger" is totally biting Jim's style - how gauche. "
Nah, he's biting off of the eeriely Puce-like Proprietor of the Iraq War Was Wrong Blog. Actually, I think he's a regular commenter over there.
Posted by: Sortelli at October 26, 2004 01:00 AMActually, TIWWWB isn't even remotely Puce like, so please ignore everything I say.
Posted by: Sortelli at October 26, 2004 01:00 AMoh SNAP Jim (non-dhinger Jim) you are kicking butt here. So muhc dhinger butt. Do'nt worry bro you got a ally here too. We do'nt even have to be trolls, we just have to speak the TRUHT.
I don'nt know why but (for some reasoning) this totally makes me think of that Bob Dyland song "oh baby baby its a wide world"
Posted by: daisythelamb(ALIAS) at October 26, 2004 02:55 AMThanks daisy (because actually its scary going against them. There THRETINING me to try to squish dissent and its HARD (cried a little at one point, there dhingers see some people have feelings bet you never heard of that being reputzi dhingers.)
Yes Sortelli I'm a regular over there at pretty much one of the bests blogs around besides Yglesias (no offense to Iraqwarwrong whos' a total Matthew nut like me. Kudos to Sortelli who oviously READS things that aren't dhingers (ever heard of it dhingers) to make him think (try Matthew too Sortelli)
Jim
Posted by: notadhinger at October 26, 2004 05:30 AMDaisy, that wasn't Bob Dylan, that was Cat Stevens (or Yusuf Islam or whatever his Muslim name is).
Hey, I heard that Kerry's reworking Tennessee Ernie Ford's "16 Tons" to make it about HMX and RDX explosives and calling it "380 Tons." Remember, since there were no stockpiles of WMDs found in Iraq, there was no reason to go to war in Iraq, right? Conventional weapons, even high explosives, no harm, no foul, right? Get your story straight, loony lefties!
Or maybe it's just possible that a guy who had 600,000 TONS of munitions lying around his country, 50 pounds worth for every man, woman and child in Iraq, might actually have been a threat to us, even if he had gotten rid of his WMDs (which we only learned after the fact)? You couldn't swing a dead cat in Iraq without hitting something explosive...
Posted by: BarCodeKing at October 26, 2004 06:08 AM