(Click the image to read the story.)
Posted by Jim Treacher at January 31, 2005 07:11 AMI have to agree with his thesis - can investigative reporting have a future if you aren't allowed little mistakes like airing a story with a bunch of false evidence?
Interestingly, Mapes does have an authentic 1972-era hairdo.
Posted by: Hubris at January 31, 2005 07:25 AMHey, let's not forget that Jesus wore sandals, too.
Posted by: michele at January 31, 2005 07:37 AMhttp://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/features/10972/
Another mistake: The title of this article refers to "Martha Mapes."
Posted by: Matthew at January 31, 2005 08:08 AMWho edits this rag? The teaser (or whatever the journalistically-correct term is) includes the following line: "Is her sin really worthy of a scandal?"
Huh?
Posted by: insomni at January 31, 2005 02:54 PMI think it's a Lifetime network in-house publication.
Posted by: Hubris at January 31, 2005 03:08 PM> Mapes does have an authentic
> 1972-era hairdo.
A woman's fashion taste often freezes the day she has her first orgasm. Or in Mapes' case, the last.
Posted by: NBC news viewer at January 31, 2005 03:32 PMWho would ever admit to having slept with her?
Posted by: foo at January 31, 2005 08:55 PMWhat DID Donald Trump ever see in this Mary Maples, anyway?
Posted by: Matt at January 31, 2005 09:08 PMIs she scottish?
In that picture she looks uncannily like the progeny of one of those (very) lonely highland shepherds. And I don't just mean the sheep-like vapid stare.
Posted by: Russell Wardlow at January 31, 2005 10:43 PM